Still stinging from
candidate-now-President-Elect Kennedy’s criticism over his "missile gap," Eisenhower's Farewell Address
was delivered in a television broadcast. It remains memorable for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence
of the “military–industrial complex.” Though Ike is always credited with coining the term, his
smarter brother Milton Eisenhower and main speechwriter Malcolm Moos were the ones who developed
Ike’s “historic” final statement. (20) The canned and over-rated speech had gone through
20 drafts over the course of the several months that it was worked on.
We have already established the shockingly pro-Communist resume of FDR’s beloved Milton Eisenhower. As for speechwriter
Malcolm Moos, well, he was just as bad, and just as “red.” Following his ventriloquist work for
President Eisenhower, Moos went on to write speeches for super Globalist Nelson Rockefeller and also worked
for the Globalist Ford Foundation. He capped off his career with a 7-year tour as the President of Minnesota
University (1967-1974). During his university presidency, Moos openly encourage leftist “activism” and
presided over the establishment of garbage Marxist “majors” in African American Studies, Native American Studies,
Chicano Studies, Women's Studies, and the Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
Milton and Malcolm -- what a pair of Marxist beauties, eh? These then were the unseen ventriloquists who put the “historic”
words in the dummy Eisenhower’s mouth. An excerpt:
the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by
the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will
persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing
for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery
of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.” (21)
Marxist Malcolm Moos and Marxist Milton Eisenhower
worried that a “military-industrial complex” might one day rise to free America from the clutches of Globalism.
Dim-witted 'Ike' read the script which they penned.
During the 1960’s / 1970’s Vietnam War era,
the term “military-industrial complex” became a favorite cliché of the Marxist long-haired “peace-love-dope”
pseudo-intellectual hippy crowd that wrongly blamed this shadowy “complex” for a war which actually originated
with Ike’s deployment of “advisers” (CIA) to Vietnam during the 1950’s.
In years since, conservative patriots and libertarians have carelessly adopted the term as well. The
problem is, there is not now and nor was there ever any “military-industrial complex” that could “endanger
our liberties or democratic processes,” for the simple reason that military generals / admirals and manufacturing
CEO’s can neither take America to war, nor dictate the size of defense budgets, nor influence politicians to do so.
Sure, there may be glory-seeking military men and greedy
arms manufacturers who, for obvious reasons, love war. But they do not have political power. Globalist media and banking moguls install the politicians and the politicians appoint the military leaders
-- not the other way around. Seriously, can anyone cite a single instance in American history in which a general or
an armaments manufacturing CEO, acting independently of the political class, dictated our domestic politics or foreign affairs?
The answer is, “no,” not even close.
to Milton and Malcolm’s slogan, it is the banking-government-tax exempt foundation-academia-media-Zionist
complex that represents the “acquisition of unwarranted influence” and the “disastrous rise of misplaced
power.” But the Eisenhowers didn’t want to talk about that complex because it was the very
same power that made them!
As Globalists who believed that
the power of the UN military should one day surpass and absorb the US military, it made perfect sense to denigrate the nation’s
patriotic military leaders (recall Ike’s hatred for patriotic Generals Patton, Devers, and MacArthur), -- especially
the ones feeding JFK information over the concerns they had about Eisenhower’s policies -- as some sort of evil plotters.
As Marxists who believed that the government should take over or dictate to private enterprise, it also made perfect sense
to cast the captains of the industrial business community as "capitalist" villains.
Put them both together and what do you have? You have the evil, conspiratorial and completely mythical
military-industrial complex --- a phantom menace that needs to be brought under the control of the
oh-so-benevolent Globalists. Get it? You see, if and when America was to ever fall to a Globalist tyranny (and we are
almost there) the only force that could possibly mobilize and save the day at the 11th hour would be the combined
power of the business and military communities. If anti-Globalist businessmen-patriots the likes of Henry Ford,
Benjamin Freedman and Robert Welch ever “conspired” for freedom with anti-Globalist
military-patriots such as George Patton and Douglas MacArthur, it would be all over for
The New World Order, and right quick too! And that, dear reader was the “threat” that the Globalist Eisenhowers
were really concerned about – a “threat” which has since been expanded to include armed local police and
lawful gun owners.
Consistent with the theme of this piece, we now suspect that patriotic elements of this "Military-Industrial
Complex" were the ones who hacked Democrat E-mails, leaked the incriminating evidence which sank the campaign of Killary
Clinton, and are now protecting Trump as investigations into Killary and many others proceed quitely.
Patriotic anti-communist Generals Patton
(1) and MacArthur (2) were both HATED by Eisenhower. 3. Businessman Trump with the generals and admirals
behind him. This is the "military-industrial complex" that "Deep State" Globalists like Moos and the
Eisenhowers always feared.