ANTI-NY TIMES ARCHIVES / PREVIOUS MONTHS
News That Sulzberger's Propaganda Rag Saw Fit To Distort"
Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions,
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines
OCTOBER 2019 1 FED RESERVE NOTE
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"
FOR ANY GIVEN MONTH APPEAR ON SAME PAGE -- MOST RECENT FIRST -- SCROLL DOWN FOR PAST DATES.
THURSDAY / OCTOBER 31, 2019
The Armenian genocide memorial
complex in Yerevan, Armenia’s capital. The House vote was bound to infuriate leaders in Turkey
NY Times: House Passes Bipartisan Resolution Recognizing Armenian Genocide
NY Times: In Another Bipartisan Rebuke of Trump, House Votes for Sanctions Against
Trump may like him, but up and down the New York - DC corridor, there is now "overwhelming" ™
hatred for Turkish "dictator" Recip Erdogan. It's
gotten so bad that, all of a sudden, Congress, after 104 years, is recognizing the World War I ethic cleansing / genocide
of the Armenian Christians -- a tragic but exaggerated event engineered primarily by secular Turks under
Jewish leadership, not Muslims. Here are the opening lines from each of the two above-listed articles -- with trade-marked
buzzwords in red:
"The House voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to impose a series
of sweeping sanctions on Turkey over its brutal assault on the Kurds
in northern Syria, dealing its second bipartisan
rebuke to President Trump this month for pulling back American forces to allow for the Turkish
"The House voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to formally
recognize the Armenian genocide and denounce it as a matter of American foreign policy, a symbolic vindication for the
Armenian diaspora made possible by a new torrent of bipartisan furor at Turkey."
nearly the whole of the otherwise contentious Congress and/or Senate of the United States put aside their Blue vs Red / Donkey
vs Elephant differences and suddenly and "overwhelmingly" ™ become "bipartisan" ™ --
it can only mean one thing, namely, that the "usual suspects" are united behind
it. (cough cough).
1. The Young Turks was a political
reform movement in the early 20th century. Their followers, including army officers, favoured the replacement of the monarchy
with a more "democratic" government. After the 1908 revolution,
the Young Turks established a political party -- the Committee of Union and Progress. During World War I, the "liberal"
secularists took a hardline against the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire whom they accused of helping their Russian adversaries
during World War I. Whatever happened to the Armenians should be blamed on the left-leaning / Jewish-led Young Turks --- not
today's Turks and certainly not "the Muslims." // 2 & 3. Trump's respect and admiration for "strongman"
Erdogan has been the subject of much scorn and ridicule by the Establishment scum of NY-DC.
1. 2015: The Kings of Jewish
Hollywood -- who are now anti-Turkey -- dispatched the vile Kardashian whores, Kim & Chloe, to Armenia to lay flowers
at the "genocide" memorial (as if these idiots give a rat's ass). The "Armenian" Kardashian skanks are descended from Armenian
immigrants, on one branch of their father's line only, from 140 years ago! // 2. The unfunny Saturday Night Live mocks the
Here's the scoop on Erdogan: His chumminess with Putin, his nationalism, his "authoritarianism ™,"
and his cultural conservatism are all positions which the Soros-type Jews of the Globalist Mafia absolutely detest. And his
blistering condemnations of Israel in general and Satanyahoo in particular are equally offensive to the Israel Firster faction
of the American PRC (Predatory Ruling Class). Hence, the "overwhelming" ™ and "bipartisan" ™ hate on Turkey. The following headlines
paint the picture very clearly.
- Foreign Policy Magazine: (October
28, 2019) / Erdogan and Putin Made a Deal for Syria
- The Hill (October 17, 2019) / Trump
Praises Turkey's Erdogan After US Announces Cease-Fire Deal
- The Independent (UK): (June 30, 2019) / Turkish Police Fire Tear Gas at Istanbul Gay Pride March
- Haaretz (Israel) (March 13, 2019): / Erdogan Accuses Netanyahu of Being Child-Killing
- The Hill
(December 33, 2018): / Netanyahu Calls Erdogan "Anti-Semitic Dictator"
- Haaretz (Israel): (November 26, 2018) / Erdogan's Latest Target: "Infamous Hungarian Jew,"
- Bloomberg News (November 21, 2018):
/ Erdogan Joins in on the Vilification of George Soros
- Think Progress: (July 10, 2017) / Turkey Won't
Ratify Climate Accord
- New York Slimes (June
19, 2013) / Turkish Liberals Turn Their Backs on Erdogan
There are countless similar articles
-- but "youse guys" get the point.
Soros and Ultra-Nationalist Satanyahoo hate each other -- but they BOTH hate Erdogan.
In addition to similar policies / ideology, there is an interesting parallel between Trump and Erdogan
which Trump must surely appreciate -- and, hopefully, can emulate. In 2016, the Deep State -- working hand-in-hand with Turkish
libtards and traitors in their media, academia and military -- attempted a "color revolution" coup in Turkey, but
Erdogan saw it coming (some say he either staged it or let it happen in order to crush his enemies). He quickly incited
his supporters to come out into the streets and counter the coup. Traitors were rounded up and / or fired from their jobs
by the tens-of-thousands. In a July 2016 interview with the demonic duo of David Sanger (cough cough)
and Maggie Haberman (cough cough) of Sulzberger's Slimes, then-candidate Trump, to the dismay of
Sanger and Haberman, praised Erdogan's crackdown. Here's part of the relevant exchange:
HABERMAN: How closely did you watch last week as events were unfolding in Turkey
with the coup? Is there anything you would have done differently in how it was handled?
TRUMP: The coup was not successful, and based on the fact, and I give great credit to him for being able
to turn that around.
TRUMP: Yes, some people say that it was staged.
You know that?
SANGER: We’ve heard.
TRUMP: I don’t think so, but I do give
great credit to him for turning it around. You know, the first hour, it seemed like it was over. Then all of a sudden, and
the amazing thing is the one that won that was the people. They came out on the streets, .... The people
came out of their homes, and they were not in favor of what the military was doing. So that was quite impressive .... I
will say this: I think Turkey can do a lot against ISIS, and I would hope that if I’m dealing with them, they will
do much more about ISIS.
SANGER: Erdogan put nearly 50,000 people in jail or suspend them, suspended
thousands of teachers, he imprisoned many in the military and the police, he dismissed a lot of the judiciary. Does this
worry you? And would you rather deal with a strongman who’s also been a strong ally, or with somebody that’s
got a greater appreciation of civil liberties than Mr. Erdogan has?
TRUMP: I think right now when it comes to
civil liberties, our country has a lot of problems, and I think it’s very hard for us to get involved in other countries
when we don’t know what we are doing and we can’t see straight in our own country. ...When the world looks at
how bad the United States is, and then we go and talk about civil liberties, I don’t think we’re a very good
Hmmm. Maybe Trump is hoping to one day turn his own
followers "out in the streets" to crush the Communist scum of America? One thing is for certain, he stands virtually
alone in his defense of "authoritarians" ™ Erdogan and Putin.
The "bipartisan" ™ opposition on foreign policy will be hard to overcome.
2016: Erdogan's conservative legions took to the streets to stop the coup against him. This allowed him to crush the Deep
State traitors and neuter the Turkish Left. // 2. Slimes Jews Sanger & Haberman were shocked by candidate Trump's approving
defense of Erdogan's crackdown and purge.
read in the New York Times today that there is now overwhelming bipartisan Congressional support for
sanctioning Turkey and recognizing the Armenian genocide of 1915.
Americanus 2: Erdogan --- bad.
Editor: In spite of Trump's growing control over the Republican't Party,
it is discouraging to see how the "usual suspects" can still make so many whore congressmen dance to their tune.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 30, 2019
Kincade Fire in Sonoma County has forced nearly 200,000 people to flee their homes.
Times: Fears of More Extreme Weather as Kincade Fire
Up and down the state, wildfires are driving residents from
Yet again, "wildfires," in perfect syncronicity,
are simultaneously ravaging suburban / rural areas not far from the major population centers of Los Angeles
in the south and San Fagsicko in the north. What many geographically-challenged Boobuses don't understand
is that California's two largest cities are almost 400 miles apart -- roughly the distance between "Yankee" Princeton,
New Jersey and the state line of "Dixie" North Carolina. Hence, the fires aren't being sparked by errant wind-driven
embers crossing small areas. This peculiar statewide synchronization also occurred last year -- with the epic Woolsey
Fire, within driving distance of LA, destroying 97,000 acres, and the even worse Camp Fire, within driving distance of SF, burning 153,000
acres. Both fires ignited on November 8, 2018.
Everything from "high winds," to "excessive underbrush" to "Climate Change" ™
were blamed and are still being blamed for the horrific infernos ™. Always conveniently omitted from the list of theories is
one minor detail --- the cause of ignition! From the article:
"The worst kind of weather for wildfires — strong,
gusty winds and very low humidity — will return on Tuesday after a relative respite on Monday, the National Weather
Service said, raising the prospect of more fire outbreaks. The agency has
posted “red flag” warnings for most of Northern California and much of Southern
You catch that? The National
Weather Service is now predicting (and has been accurately predicting) "fire outbreaks" as if it they were
approaching cold fronts or rain showers. How is that even bloody possible without advance knowledge of an ignition event?
1. San Fagsicko and Los Angeles are so far
away from each other that they have very different climates. Yet -- on several occasions over recent years -- MASSIVE
fires, not far from the two cities, ignited at the same time? // L-R: Speaker Pelosi, Senator Feinstein, Senator Harris, Governor
Newsome --- Commiefornia is home to the most wicked brand of
Satanic Demonrats in the country.
We have yet to detect images from the current fires which
might show signs of suspicious, hi-tech origins or freakish burn-pattern anomalies; but numerous photos and videos from the
2018 blazes clearly revealed that some sort of advanced weaponry (Directed Energy) was used to blast so many
California neighborhoods out of existence. Have a look:
Entire neighborhoods reduced
to ash while nearby trees remain unscathed?
Impossible burn patterns
Cars melted -- trees and
leaves not even singed?
1. Blue beam captured
on I-phone video (here) // 2. Caption for CNN Video: "Watch as Fire Burns Inside of Hollow Tree" (here)
idea of driving people out of the center of the state while crashing property values fits perfectly with the United Nations
"Agenda 21" initiative for eventually herding humanity into controllable, corruptible urban areas
while depopulating all of the small towns (the true America)
in between. Communist California, as it is for so many other Satanic schemes, represents the perfect test case for such a
societal conversion. Flashback:
Forbes Magazine (December 16, 2013)
Elon Musk And Jeff Bezos'
Not-So-Secret Land Grab
the Hyperloop in place, SF-to-LA ... the entire center of the state (possibly) becomes gutted in the center, as big city
living becomes accessible to any and all.... And
one way or another it’s coming.
Or something very much like it.
drone delivery (Amazon), rural residents can get what they need far faster than they can drive into town. So what do you
think this means for the future of most small towns?"
It has been observed that the statewide pattern of the fires which have
displaced so many tens of thousands of California suburbanites resembles, "coincidentally," the
proposed routes for both the proposed Los Angeles to San Fagsicko "Hyperloop" and the
high-speed rail. Hyperloop is a form of ground / underground transportation currently in development by several companies. The concept involves floating
pods within low-pressure tubes that would transport passengers at airliner speeds.
of leading competitors to build the LA-SF Hyperloop is the Boring Company -- headed
by the shady CIA front-man Elon Musk, of the even shadier SpaceX. For the LA-SF loop, "The Amazing Musk," -- who also runs Tesla Motors,
Solar City and Nueralink -- estimates a price tag of about $6 Billion for a system that would provide a 30 minute ride between the two major cities.
these DEW fires be a form of "Eminent Domain" --- an "Agenda 21" clearing-out of
large inhabited areas (mainly Republican voters too) to open the path for Musk's Hyperloop?
The respective routes
for the proposed Hyperloop (Image 2) and the depopulating "wildfires" (Image 3) match up very
It will be interesting to see if, in the coming months and years,
a Musk Hyperloop system. Or, will "Sir" Richard Branson
-- whose "Virgin Hyperloop" is also in the running for the LA-SF project -- be the chosen one?
.. Or, -- will it be a high-speed
rail system (which Diane Feinstein's husband is linked to (here)) that gets established along the route of these fires? The most discouraging part of these tragedies
is that no one -- neither Trump nor the "The White Hats" -- seems able to put a stop to these suspicious fires and
bring the perps to justice. Even if DEW attacks from air or space were to be neutralized, how do we stop Deep State actors
with gasoline cans in the middle of the night? You can't.
read in the New York Times today that they are expecting more fires to break out all across California.
Americanus 2: It's amazing how they
can now predict the outbreaks of these fires.
Sugar: It's not "amazing," Boobuss!!! It's a frickin' CONSPIRACY!!!
Editor: An added twist to this latest round of fires
is the mandatory blackouts making life miserable for MILLIONS of people in the same center-part of the state.
To our readers in Commiefornia
-- Our "thought & prayers" ™ go out to you. If you still have
power, we'd love to hear from youse guys as to what you are witnessing and hearing.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
TUESDAY / OCTOBER 29, 2019
NY Times: Art Looted by Nazis Gets a New Space at the
Louvre. But Is It Really Home?
The World War II song that never ends has many recurring
stanzas. The main one, of course -- outnumbering the other well worn-out verses by a ratio of 1000 to 1 -- is, as we
all know, that tiresome refrain about the 6,000,000 ™ Jews who died in "zee gas chambers."
™ But as for that second tier of recycled myths that the "the powers that be" (cough
cough) have crapped into the well of public consciousness for the past 75 years or so, the fairy tale of "Nazi
looted art" ™ ranks very high on the repetition meter.
As long as the slandering scribblers
of Sulzberger's Slimes insist of repeating this looted-art libel,
St. Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial
Board of The Anti-New York Times will just have to keep on rebutting it. Most of "youse guys" already
know the background -- but here's a quick refresher to set the context for the art-scam end game presented at the end of this
The song that never ends
will be countered by ANYT rebuttals that never end.
War I, under Kaiser Wilhelm II, the highly cultured Germans had gone to great
lengths to protect and preserve artworks located in combat zones. The German word to describe this principal of saving Europe's
cultural and artistic treasures during wartime is "Kunstschutz" (art protection). At the end of World War I, rescued artworks were returned voluntarily. Unlike World
War II, anti-German propaganda actually faded away following World War I. As a result, Germany was later praised for "Kunstschutz" / art protection during "The Great War."
1 & 2: Kaiser Wilhelm
tried to avert the war which was forced upon Germany. Even while winning the war, the Kaiser held out
an olive branch to the Allies, while his Kunstschutz units protected artworks belonging to enemy
nations. // 3. World War I was very destructive. Thanks
to Germany, many works of art located in Belgium and France were saved.
A talented painter himself, Adolf Hitler has a great appreciation for art and culture. He saw Churchill and FDR as uncultured
barbarians with merciless disregard for innocent life, architecture, and works of art. As the Germans had done during World
War I, Hitler too ordered the protection of artworks throughout the combat theatres of Europe. The task of protecting the
art was handed over to Air Force Marshal Hermann Goering.
As Allied terror bombing ravaged Europe,
thousands of paintings and sculptures from Italy, France, Belgium, Russia, Romania, and Poland were gathered and meticulously
inventoried by the Germans. This process only began in the fall of 1943. Had the Germans wanted to "loot"
the art of Europe, they could easily have done so in 1940, 1941, 1942, and the first 9 months of 1943.
It was only after Allied carpet bombardment was unleashed upon Italy (later on France), and
the Soviets began advancing from the East, that the German began gathering up the artwork and evacuating cultural centers
such as Athens, Rome and Florence so that no battles would take place in them.
men of culture, Hitler and Goring placed high priority on art protection. Rescued from Naples: 'Danaë' by Titian (l) and "The Blind Leading
The Blind" by Pieter Bruegel
After the war, the American
Art Looting Investigation Unit (ALIU) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) issued 13 reports
on the German “looting” of artworks. By the way, this is the same OSS (forerunner of the CIA / "Deep
State" ) that also accused the Germans of using dead Jews to make “shrunken heads,” “lamp shades,”
and “bars of soap” - allegations which are today universally acknowledged as false. In the decades following the war, endlessly repeated propaganda has
elevated the OSS-CIA fable of “looted Nazi art” into a virtual reality in the minds of the
There is also a financial twist to this lie. See if you can detect
it in the following excerpts from this article. We'll even put the hints in bold for "youse guys":
"Critics, while praising
the intention, say the new rooms represent a missed opportunity because they do little to further the search for
the rightful owners of the paintings or their heirs....
An estimated 100,000 objects in France alone were looted by
the Nazis or sold under duress and transferred to Germany — paintings, but also drawings, sculptures and antiquities. Many had belonged to Jewish families whose homes were raided during the Nazi occupation,
or who were forced to sell art to survive or to flee the country."
See the scam?
We knew that you could. Here's a headline from this past July:
- New York Slimes: (July 10, 2019): Court Says Heirs of Holocaust Victim Can
Keep Nazi-Looted Works
And another from this past May:
York Slimes: (May 20, 2019): A Painting
Looted by and Returned to Nazis Finally Goes to Its Jewish Owners
And another from last year:
- New York Slimes: (October 31, 2018): (The Rosenberg) Family Recovered Most of What the Nazis Stole.
- New York Slimes: (March 7, 2017): German Foundation
to Help Jewish Heirs in Search for Nazi Looted Art
And many more articles like these.
Evidently, only Jews owned art. Oy frickin' vey! These money-grubbing shysters
would lay ancestral ownership claims to Leonardo's Mona Lisa and Michelangelo's David if they thought they could get away
1. The "Cloak
& Dagger" Logo of the OSS says it all! This agency -- whose stated purpose involves strategic deception
and propaganda -- crafted the "looted art" lie. 2. The mass-murderer Eisenhower (shown examining "looted art") also
helped to sell the post war lie. 3.
Schemer says: "Oy vey! Zee paintings in the Louvre actually belonged to my Great Uncle's first cousin twice-removed.
Zee whole family vas gassed in Aushvitz so I am zee only remaining heir. I svear to God!"
1: I read in the New York Times today that an exhibit of Nazi-looted art in the the Louvre may be
displaying artworks whose rightful owners may be Jewish families.
2: Perhaps they should sue the Louvre to get them
St. Sugar: They will Boobuss, they will.
Jusst give it time.
they would win too. They always win.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
MONDAY / OCTOBER 28, 2019
NY Times: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, ISIS Leader Known for His Brutality, Is Dead at
NY Times: Watching the Raid Was Like a Movie, the President
Pulling a page from his Deep State adversary's own play-book of hysterical hoaxery fit for credulous cretins, Donald
Trump just staged a so-called “killing’ of the so-called “founder” of ISIS. We say “so
called” because, as regular readers of The Anti-New York Times all know by now, ISIS is just a mercenary
front group assembled, trained and funded by a collaborative effort of CIA and Mossad. The “Baghdadi” character
is just that – a character in the show.
The timing was oh-so-perfect too. Just when all of Libtardia and Neocondom were wringing their blood-soaked
hands over "impeachment" ™
and the expected "resurgence" of ISIS that Trump’s "controversial" Syria pullout idea was supposed
to cause, now comes word that the king of terrorist bogeymen has been killed (again!). With Trump watching via live-feed,
the Evil One, we are told, while "crying, whimpering and screaming," detonated his "suicide vest"
(ha ha ha ha) as he was being pursued by commandos and their dogs. One of the fearless canines, we are also told, was
injured in the blast (cue sad music -- rolling eyes) but is expected to recover (yay! -- a happy ending!).
It sure was a stroke of good fortune for the good guys that Mr. Baghdadi didn't think of detonating his explosive vest
(which, he just happened to have handy) while bum-rushing the Delta Force heroes who came to get
him. He could have taken a few of them, and their doggies, out with himself. Evidently, he wasn't thinking. (rolling eyes)
Just for good measure, we got his "Number 2" also. And so, just like that, the “ISIS-will-now-come-back-to-Syria”
mantra / argument has been countered and smashed to bits as Trump’s approval numbers will surely pop up a bit. Merikans just luuv to see Muslim "bad guys" get whacked, dontcha know? -- "USA!
played, Trump. Well played.
1. As scripted
by CIA -- the unfunny Saturday Night Live featured an "ISIS terrorist" (Pete Davidson) thanking Trump (played by
Alec Baldwin) for bringing jobs back to ISIS in Syria. // 2. Trump's pre-hyped Sunday morning announcement of the "killing"
of the "leader" of ISIS blows a big hole in the CIA's scripted argument. // 3. CIA / CNN was forced to report what
Trump wanted them to.
never take me alive! Allah Akbar!"
As part of the Trump-Killed-Baghdadi made-for-TV
farce, Trump, in that classic “trolling” form that he has become known for, mimicked the Obama-Killed-Osama made-for-TV
farce of 2011 -- a scam which -- as we covered last week -- was necessitated by the fact that Trump, at that time, was heavily
pressuring Obongo to release his Birth Certificate. The beauty of this trick is that the Deep State media, in spite of the
disbelief of its mouthpieces, has to sell Trump's fairy tale. They wouldn't dare accuse Trump of staging a hoax because that
would open a counter-charge of Obongo staging a hoax in 2011. The phrase "hoisted on one's own petard" (bomb)
However, Peter Souza,
the photographer who took the clearly staged “Situation Room” photo of Obongo and friends, has openly accused
Trump of staging a similar photo to publicize his raid. To be clear, Souza did not say that the raid itself was staged, just
the photo. Note below -- the similarities between the Obama-Killed-Osama group photo and the Trump-Killed-Baghdadi group photo.
Again, it is obvious that Trump is “trolling” Obongo.
Souza -- Obongo's sycophantic photographer - knows A LOT about staging photos. // 2. It was Souza who staged (or perhaps even
photo-shopped) the bizarre 2011 "Situation Room" shot of Obongo's team watching the "Bin Laden Raid."
// 2. The Trump "Situation Room" photo
is an obvious mockery of Souza's farce (with similar laptops and wires strewn about) - and Souza knows it!
Anti-New York Times, as an independent blogger, enjoys the
luxury of always, though sometimes imperfectly, presenting the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth – and
without the slightest trace of any apologetic anesthesia for the easily offended. In an ideal world, we could and should all
demand the same standard from government officials.
But ours is not an ideal world – far from it. While demons in human form infest the highest tiers of our critical
institutions, dumb animals in human form constitute the broad mass of the “electorate" ™. Therefore, if the Trump-Killed-Baghdadi charade succeeded in countering
deceitful Deep State propaganda while wowing the boobs out there in TV land – well, so be it.
Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
Trump's righteous scam
amounts to a "noble lie" which simultaneously neutralized the Deep State operatives -- while satisfying the patriotards
over the alleged shed-blood of some big bad "Islamic Terrorists."
This just in....
Trump: "After the mission was accomplished, we took highly sensitive material
and information from the raid, much having to do with ISIS origins,
future plans, things that we very much want."
Information about "ISIS origins,"
eh? That ought to make certain people nervous. Hmmm. Stay tuned.
1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump just killed
the leader of ISIS.
Americanus 2: Well, I guess the critics were wrong about
ISIS making a comeback in Syria because we were leaving. Good for Trump.
St. Sugar: Boobuss, you frickin' .....
Editor: Shhhhhh! Sorry to cut you off, baby girl. But it's best that Boobuss
keeps believes in this particular fairy tale.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
SUNDAY / OCTOBER 27, 2019
NY Times: The Cost of Trump’s Aid Freeze in the Trenches of Ukraine’s
As President Trump froze military aid to Ukraine and urged it to investigate his rivals, the country
was struggling in a bare-bones fight against Russian-backed separatists.
By ANDREW E. KRAMER
|For the few remaining Trump-haters who haven't abandoned
us yet, this story too will likely fall upon deaf ears. But facts are facts. Trump has ended the Korean Cold War; ended the
Syrian proxy war; and, for all intents and purposes, also ended the Ukrainie vs East Ukraine War which had the potential to
enlame all of Europe in a NATO vs Russia conflict. Exactly as he did to the CIA/Mossad proxies "rebels" in Syria
(here), he brought about peace by cutting off funding and military supplis to the CIA/Mossad proxies terrorist proxies of Ukraine. See
the pattern summarized by the two headlines posted below:
NY Times: (July 19, 2017): Trump Ends
Covert Aid to Syrian Rebels Trying to Topple Assad
NY Times: (October 25, 2019): The Cost of Trump’s
Aid Freeze in the Trenches of Ukraine’s War The latter story explains:
politically disorganized and militarily weak, has relied heavily on the United States in its struggle with Russian-backed
separatists. But the White House abruptly suspended nearly $400 million in military aid to Ukraine in July and only restored
it last month after a bipartisan uproar in Congress.
Ukrainian soldiers here at the front line were jolted by the suspension,
too. While the aid was restored in time to prevent any military setbacks, it took a heavy psychological toll, they said, striking
at their confidence that their backers in Washington stood solidly behind their fight to keep Russia at bay."
Some of youse guys can keep saying that Trump is a Rothschild
stooge and a Globalist psyop if you insist, but facts are facts --Trump, in fulfullment of his 2016 campaign promises; and
in the face of "bipartisan" ™ Congressional opposition, prevented a world war which the
demon George Soros (cough cough) openly threatened (here); and a President Killary would surely have kicked-off. The fact that Trump won't be able to magically save, heal and restore a badly diseased, degenerative and decayed White western civilization -- which
is already too far gone -- is neither his fault. nor under his control. Just be thankful that millions
of innocent people alive today, on multiple continents (including
Americans), would have been dead, crippled or homeless
had he not been elected in 2016.
Killary Clinton openly screamed for "no fly zones" in Syria and also for supplying Ukraine with more arms as well
as tactical support from U.S. "advisers." // 2. The new American boss brought the new boss of Ukraine (Zelensky)
to heel, and soon, start a dialogue with Putin. -- Trump on Zelinsky: “I think he’s
going to make a deal with President Putin, and he will be invited to the White House.” // 3. Were it not for
the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize is a Globalist scam, Trump should have three of them by now (one each for Syria 2017,
Korea 2018, Ukraine 2019)
With the warmongering Globalists now in desperate attack / "impeachment" ™
mode against Trump, now would be a good "teachable moment" ™ for a crash-course review of the engineered events which drove the two brotherly Eastern
European nations of same blood, same history, same culture and similar language to become enemies -- mainly due to the "annexation"
of Crimea -- and nearly drove the U.S. into war in Europe.
The demonic drive to set
brotherly states Russia and Ukraine against each other over the Crimean peninsula was engineered by the usual suspects.
The following, point-by-point contextual analysis will serve to unravel a seemingly
complex knot of information. This information is critical
to understanding what was recently a potential World War 3 hot-spot -- which is why these facts have been downplayed,
totally buried, or unnecessarily complicated by the seditious scum at Sulzberger Slimes.
12 EASY STEPS TO TRUTH
1600's - 1900's: Dating back to the earliest days of the Russian Empire, through the seven decades
of the Soviet Union, the region known as Ukraine, along with Belarus, has always been a
brotherly part of the Russian-Soviet state. Ethic /tribal ties among the three go back as many as 1,000 years.
2. 1954: As part of a symbolic gesture
marking the 300th anniversary of Ukraine becoming a part of the Tsardom
of Russia, an administrative action transferred the government of the Crimean Peninsula from
the Russian Soviet Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
3. 1991: Under Globalist pressure from without and the treason of Mikhail
Gorbachev from within, the Soviet Union dissolved into 15 republics. Suddenly, the Russian-speaking people on the
Crimean Peninsula were no longer affiliated with Russia. Crimea, given no say in the matter, thus became an unwilling region
of the new nation of Ukraine. The Russians did however maintain a vital naval base on the peninsula -- one which NATO was
1. Crimea: A strategically vital part of Russia for centuries. 2. Kruschev's gang symbolically transferred it from Russia to Ukraine. 3. Russian Crimeans, against
their will, were abandoned to the new state of Ukraine after the demise of the U.S.S.R.
The post-Soviet period was marked by constant back-and-forth power struggles within Ukraine between its CIA-Globalist "color
revolution" puppet faction and its Russia-friendly faction. On election days, the Russian-speaking Crimean people always
voted against the Globalist puppets in overwhelming numbers
5. 2010: Viktor
Yanukovich is elected the 4th President of Ukraine. He tries to establish good ties with both Russia and the West.
The Globalists believe that they can court Yanukovich and eventually lure him into the European Union / NATO web.
6. 2013: The Yanukovich government stuns the Globalists by ending the process of integration
into the European Union and embracing
Putin's multi-lateral worldview instead.
1. The 2004 "Orange Revolution" was made in
the USA, by the CIA. // 2. After power changed hands again in 2010, Obongo and his handlers thought they could control the
new president, Victor Yanukovich (above, with Mr. and Mr. (not a typo)
Obongo) // 3. Yanukovich tries to escape the NWO plantation and buddy-up with Putin.
Late 2013: The Soros-Rothschild-CIA crime syndicate flips a switch and BOOM -- HUGE "spontaneous" pro-EU,
anti- "corruption" protests erupt in the Ukrainian capital city of Kiev.
December, 2013: Soros agent Senator John McStain (with the full blessing of Obongo) arrives
in Ukraine to fire up the ugly rent-a-mob. He pledges American support for their cause.
February, 2014: The mob turns violent. Yanukovich -- the duly-elected president -- is forced to flee for his life
1. The "spontaneous" anti-Yanukovich protests in Kiev's
"Maidan Square" -- with EU flags and many English-language signs -- was a Western "Deep State" production
all the way. // 2. Bastard McCain lit the fuse! // 3. Death and destruction overthrew the legitimate anti-EU government of
Ukraine -- and the Fake News cheered it as an "anti-corruption" movement!
10. February, 2014:
The hand-picked stooges of U.S. Under-Secretary of State
Vicky Nuland (Nudelman) -Kagan (cough cough) are installed. NATO is on a path toward establishing first strike missile capability right on the border of Russia.
February, 2014: Spooked by the criminal events and bloodshed in Kiev, the predominantly Russian people of Crimea
take to the streets to protest for a clean break from Ukraine and a return to Russian sovereignty. When Crimean self-defense
forces deploy in support of the people against Soros-CIA agitators based in Ukraine, the Fake News shrieks about a "Russian
invasion" of "little green men."
12. March, 2014: Crimea holds
a referendum with international observers present. By a vote of 97% to 3%, they choose to separate from the
gangster government of Kiev and return to Russian sovereignty. Russia accepts their Crimean brothers and vows to protect them.
And the Fake News and all the political whores of the New World Order haven't stopped bitching and whining
and sanctioning and threatening Russia over Putin's "annexation" of Crimea ever since.
1. After the violent coup, Nudelman and
her hand-picked Ukrainian puppets formed a new dictatorship in Kiev -- answerable only to the Globalists. // 2. The Crimean
people celebrated their democratic return to Mother Russia. // 3. "Putin is Hitler" --- blah blah blah... blah blah
There --- see how bloody darn simple it can be to understand the
truth about the world when the main data points are presented in basic sequential format? Lies complicate. Truth simplifies.
Oh if only TomatoBubble.com / ANYT were better-funded! What a much larger audience we could build (hint
1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump abandoned
our brave Ukrainian allies in their fight against Putin.
I saw on televison that he also abandoned our brave Kurdish allies in Syria. Horrible... just
St. Sugar: Boobuss, you frickin' dim-witted dolt! The only people that Trump
hass abandoned are the Deep Sstate warmongerss who engineered thesse endlesss warss.
Editor: The Boobus Brothers still don't understand that "our allies"
is Globo code-language for terrorist puppets and proxies.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
THURSDAY / OCTOBER 24, 2019
Times: Trump Calls Impeachment Inquiry a ‘Lynching’
Following the lead of Sulzberger’s Slimes, all of the obedient operatives of Marxist Libtardia have got their
pink panties in a bunch over Trump’s use of the term “lynching” to describe the Demonrats unremitting efforts
to “impeach” ™ him in advance of the 2020 QFS (Quadrennial
than to again note that the Communists have walked right into Trump’s trap with this impeachment
circus they are running, we’re not going to get into the latest developments of this drama down in DC. Instead, let
us use this manufactured uproar over the word, “lynching” as a “teachable moment” ™
to clarify what the past practice of lynching was really about; and to also recall what was done to another anti-Globalist
historical figure after he used that term.
Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys and
girls. Into Sulzberger’s seditious cesspool we go for a bit of historical clean-up.
House "shiksa" Eileen Sullivan is troubled over Trump's use of the word "lynching" to describe what his
enemies are trying to do to him. // 2 & 3. Not a day passes without the scum of the Left playing "The Race Card."
Sullivan): President Trump on Tuesday called the impeachment
inquiry into him a “lynching,” using a term associated with the murders …
Rebuttal: Correction! With the exception of any rare cases in which an innocent man may have been killed by
a frenzied mob, these were not “murders.” They were executions of murderers, rapists and, in the West,
Slimes: … of black people
again! Actually, many, if not more, Whites were lynched in the old South and also in the “Wild West” than Blacks.
In some cases, Black criminals were lynched by righteously indignant fellow Blacks.
to describe a process enshrined in the Constitution.
how solemn the hack-writer tries to make this silly spectacle sound -- “enshrined in the Constitution.” Always
amusing to see Constitution-hating Marxists invoke the suddenly-sacred “Constitution” when it fits their purposes,
isn’t it? Ironically, it is the lawless Demonrats with their false accusations, anonymous witnesses and secret hearings
that are truly violating the Constitution.
By the way, Ms. Sullivan, you do realize that James Madison
-- the primary author of the Constitution -- was a slave-owner? Don't you think it is "insensitive" ™
to be promoting the work of a "white supremacist ™"?
Slimes: The term lynching invokes the decades-long racist history of white mob murders of black people beginning
in the late 1800s and through the late 1960s.
Rebuttal: Oh sure. Mobs of Christian
White folks in the South would just wake up on any given day, pluck an innocent Negro off the street, and then hang him from
a tree --- just for the fun and giggles of it, dontcha know? In the words of that 1980’s song that sticks in the head,
“Come on, Eileen.” --- Cut the crap!
And by the way, regular occurences of
lynchings ended about 1920, not "the late 1960's."
Slimes: “I know the history of that word,” Representative James E. Clyburn, Democrat of South
Carolina said on CNN Tuesday. “That is a word that we ought to be very, very careful about.”
up, Congressman. When ya boy Bill Clinton was impeached back in the day, all of your Demonrat colleagues were using that
very same term. It was OK then, right?
Slimes: It was a remarkable term for the president to use ... .
Rebuttal: A “remarkable
term,” eh? Oh the bloody drama!
Slimes: ... to describe a legal process laid out in the Constitution
Rebuttal: Again with the phony reverence for "the Constitution?!" ---
which is supposed to restrict the size of government and limit the power of the Feds -- that document which you filthy totalitarian-minded
commies and brain-dead libtards have long told us was "antiquated" and "insufficient" for the needs of
the modern world?
Most of the Blacks who were lynched had raped White women. // 2. When "men was men." // 3. Many White criminals
were also lynched -- so why make the word racial?
A Tale of Two McCarthy's
Kevin McCarthy Wets the Bed
Slimes: The top Republican in the House, Representative
Kevin McCarthy of California, said of Mr. Trump’s lynching comparison, “I don’t agree with that language,”
adding, “It’s pretty simple.”
Rebuttal: Mr. McCarthy. You sir,
are a pussy! (as in frightened cat ).
Trump has always backed you 100% and you can’t even straighten your spine
to defend him against this ridiculous firestorm over a harmless word so commonly used as a metaphor? Pathetic. Not to be outdone
by McCarthy, the Republican't leader in the Senate, Creepy Mitch McConnell, later referred to Trump's remarks
as "an unfortunate choice of words."
There was once another man named McCarthy. And unlike the pants-wetting Kevin
McCarthy, that McCarthy -- Joseph -- had balls of steel and the heart of a lion – which leads us to our conclusion.
Joe McCarthy Fights Back
In late 1954, the operatives of the very same New
World Order which are trying to take down Trump via “impeachment," ™ were attempting
to take down Senator Joseph McCarthy via “censure” (an official reprimand). As the committee
tasked with concocting a legitimate-sounding reason to censure McCarthy floundered, the feisty Senator, on a live TV CBS interview,
mocked the Senate committee (chaired by Eisenhower stooge, Ralph Flanders of Vermont) as a “lynching bee.”
One of the interviewers, a hack from Sulzberger’s Slimes named Bill Lawrence (cough cough)
-- feigning stunned incredulity -- responded: “You call a meeting of the United States Senate a lynch bee? ... The
Senate is an institution of government. It's part of the Congress. You call a meeting of the Senate a lynch?”
To which, McCarthy, without batting an eyelash responded,
counter-attacked and repeated: “Yes. I consider that a lynching bee. ….. When they say,
ahead of time, regardless of what the evidence says, how they're going to vote -- this man has been fighting communism. He
has been showing that for over twenty years that the Democrat Party has been infiltrated, therefore we're going to get him,
then I think a lynching is a good name for it, Bill” (Video Here)
then pounced upon that word -- not for any “racist” overtones but because McCarthy had mocked such a “revered
legal process.” A censure resolution, based in large part upon the use of the term "lynch" was drafted
up and then passed.
from Senate Resolution 301: Sec 2. "The Senator from Wisconsin, Mr. McCarthy, ..... in stating to the
press on November 4, 1954, that the special Senate session that was to begin November 8, 1954, was a "lynch-party";
in repeatedly describing this special Senate session as a "lynch bee"
in a nationwide television and radio show on November 7, 1954 ... acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute."
So you see, McCarthy was officially censured for calling what was truly a lynch mob -- which
couldn’t find anything substantive to charge him with -- well, a lynch mob. That’s what (((they))) are trying
to do to Trump now over his own use of the same word -- with the “racism” angle added to the “disreputable”
charge. This time around, it won’t work.
1. When asked about
Trump's "inappropriate" use of the term, "lynching," Rep. Kevin McCarthy was quick to shit his pants and
distance himself from the President. // 2. When challenged, on CBS TV, over his use of that same term in 1954, Joe McCarthy
immediately counter-attacked and doubled-down. // 3. Eisenhower with Senator Flanders (R-VT) -- Acting as Eisenhower's proxy,
Flanders used McCarthy's "lynch" comment to censure him in November, 1954. The anti-McCarthy "lynch bee"
helped to give the Demonrats control of the Senate in the November election (which is exactly what "Republican"
Eisenhower wanted) and thus cost McCarthy his position as Majority Chairman of the Investigations Committee.
read in the New York Times today that Trump's use of the term 'lynching' to describe the impeachment
inquiry has offended many African-Americans.
Americanus 2: It's not only racially insensitive, but it disrespects
St. Sugar: If it were
up to me I'd lynch and liquidate about three-quarterss of the whole damn Congresss!
Editor: Oh no. She's got the war paint on.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 23, 2019
Times: Why Hillary Clinton Shouldn’t Trade in
Conspiracy Theories About Tulsi Gabbard
NY Times: Tulsi Gabbard Lashes Back at Hillary Clinton After Claim of Russian Influence
Remember when Killary Clinton accused "the
of hacking some embarrassing Demonrat E-mails and funneling them through WikiLeaks? Remember when Killary claimed that "the Russians" ™ had conspired with Donald
Trump to rig the 2016 election and deny her the presidency? Now that nasty rancid harridan (a $10 word for bossy
old hag) is accusing "the Russians" ™ of grooming Congressgal and aspiring
presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) as a mole and potential third-party spoiler for
the 2020 QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show).
obsession with Russia and her fear of Russian agents hiding under every rock has earned her the mockery of not only the entirety
of "the Right," but also some of her fellow Demonrats. Her accusations against Gabbard were certainly not her best
moment. And when the feisty counter-attacking 38-year-old Congressgal strongly twitter-trashed Killary as "the
queen of warmongers, the embodiment of corruption,
and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democrat Party" -- it represented the hardest bitch-slap
laid down on the Satanic witch since the Trump-Killary debates of 2016.
Ironically, once one understands that "the Russians"
is code for the "White Hats" of the NSA (National Security Agency) and other agencies;
Killary, we believe, is actually telling the truth, albeit in cryptic form. Add Ms. Gabbard to the long list of character
actors playing an assigned role in the ongoing mother of all "sting" operations against the Deep State. Join us
for a ride on St. Sugar's "Crazy Train" as we explain.
"The Russians have got their eye on somebody who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to
be the third-party candidate.” // 2. Gabbard strikes back --- hard!
* Over the course of the past two years, Gabbard
has been invited -- MULTIPLE TIMES -- to appear on FOX's Tucker Carlson show. This is noteworthy because the contempible pedo-monster,
Adam Schiff has accused Carlson -- a pro-Trump, anti-war conservative -- of being a "Russian agent"
as well. (here)
-- degree in Business Administration, Hawaii National Guard, Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Army Military Police, and Officer
School training at Alabama Military Academy -- is more consistent with Military
Intelligence that that of a Demonrat Party operative. Her father, Mike Gabbard, is a very rare bird indeed.
He was elected to the State Senate in 2006 as a Republican in the Communist-dominated state of Obongo's Hawaii. The
following year, Gabbard, known for his patriotism and anti-sodomite marriage activism, switched parties because he felt he
could be more effective as a member of the permanently majority-party Demonrats of Hawaii. Nonetheless, he has angered many
Demonrats by opposing parts of their platform.
In 2012, daughter Tulsi was elected to Congress. Since that time, she has talked and voted
like any other Demonrat libtard, except in one very important area -- foreign policy. Gabbard's anti-war "isolationist"
position, while appealing to many pro-peace Leftists, is intolerable to Party leadership. And her 2017 trip to Syria to meet
with -- and later publicly defend -- the heroic President Assad drew heavy condemnation from the Piranha Press and fellow
Senator Mike Gabbard and daughter Tulsi. // 2. Tulsi's patriotic and military background would be more consistent with Military
Intelligence than Demonrat politics. // 3. Her open support of Assad earned her the animosity of the Establishment.
Since becoming a candidate for the Demonrat nomination, Gabbard has scraped and clawed her way into debate
notoriety by knocking out Tim Ryan over his "we-must-stay-in-Afghanistan" policy; and verbally
bitch-slapping Kamala Harris over her tyrannical record as a former prosecutor. So bad was the smack-down
on Harris that it caused the Commiefornia Senator's poll numbers to crash overnight. Gabbard has also called
the Demonrat Primary process corrupt; claimed that Google and CNN are biased toward Establishment candidates; condemned
the elite foreign policy makers as "warmongers;" and taken some strong debate shots (over foreign policy)
at "Mayor Pete" Bootyfag and Loony Lizzy Warren -- which CNN dutifully cut off! Hmmm. When
you put aside her cosmetically necessary libtarded positions on domestic issues, and her obligatory attacks against Trump,
it does appear that Ms. Gabbard is attacking the very same people and institutions that "Russian agent" Trump is
-- and drawing upon herself the same manner of vicious counter-attacks and smears from the same crowd. Some headlines from
the Piranha Press:
- The Independent (UK): Tulsi Gabbard Is A Letdown
- The Daily Beast: Tulsi Gabbard Campaign Boosted by Putin Apologists
- Yahoo: Joy Behar Says Russia Is Using Tulsi Gabbard As A 'Useful Idiot'
- New York Times: What is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?
- Washington Post: Tulsi Gabbard’s Syria Record Shows Why She Can’t Be President
- Rolling Stone: Tulsi Gabbard's Campaign May Be Over Before It Starts
and on the attacks -- which Killary has now taken to a whole new level -- go. The Demonrats cannot ignore her; but if they
attack (as Killary did) it just raises her profile. What to do -- What to do about a girl like Tulsi? But guess who
is not attacking her --- Trump! In fact, he even came to her defense:
"I don’t know Tulsi, but she’s not a Russian agent... These people (attacking
her) are sick. There’s something wrong with them.”
knows that Gabbard's candidacy has the potential to cause a serious rift among Demonrat voters between the anti-Establishment
(or so they fancy themselves) "peaceniks" of the rank & file on one side -- and the Establishment warmonger
types on the other. The Demonrats are already afraid of alienating the demented devotees of the chaos-queens of the ultra-left
"Squad" (whom we also suspect of being NSA sleeper agents). Now they have to contend with agent Tulsi causing
further havoc and division within the Party. Ain't we got fun?
Though few Gabbard primary voters will end up voting for Trump over
another Demonrat, many could stay home or vote for a third party candidate (like Gabbard?). Killary may
be sick and evil, but she is not stupid. "Russians" = NSA / Military Intelligence. She knows it, but can't exactly
the debate stage, Tulsi Gabbard absolutely savaged a clearly shaken Kamala Harris by bringing up the fact that Whore Harris,
as an ambitious prosecutor, once tried to conceal evidence that would have exonerated a murder suspect -- and had also laughed
about the fact that she prosecuted hundreds of marijuana cases although she herself smoked marijuana.
// 2. Trump defended Gabbard, but at some point, we suspect that he will strategically attack her in order to boost her standing
among Demonrats. The Demonrat Party and the Fake News will NEVER allow her to win, but the internal havoc she can cause could
read in the New York Times today about the war of words between Tulsi Gabbard and Hillary Clinton.
Americanus 2: Hillary was way out of
line in calling her a Russian agent. I happen to think that Tulsi's condemnation of perpetual regime-change wars is valid.
Sugar: Sso, Boobuss -- you agree with Trump then?
Editor: By the time this tactical manuever plays itself out, Gabbard may actually end up
pushing some anti-war libtard Demonrat voters into the Trump camp.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
TUESDAY / OCTOBER 22, 2019
NY Times: Thousands of Theodore Roosevelt’s Papers Are Now Online
|Sugar and I,
er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times have long said that there's no history like
original source history. Think about it. If you really want to get inside of the minds of the men who made history;
then why rely on an endless, repetitious circle-jerk of academic ass-clowns if you can access the actual writings and speeches
of the history-makers themselves? Original source data is especially useful if the writing artifact is a private
one. You see, communications intended for public consumption don't always reveal the true man and his beliefs. But the stuff
that a man inks for personal friends / co-conspirators or private diaries -- well, that reveals the true man.
With that investigative maxim (a
$10 word for a short statement expressing a general truth)
always in mind, this story about the Library of Congress' recently added digital archive of many of Teddy
Roosevelt's private papers and letters really got our investigative juices flowing. Just a few minutes into this
article was all it took to learn something fascinating about Teddy Psycho that we included in our recently relaesed book on
the wretched monster. We thought we should share it with "youse guys."
1. Fake historians only know how to follow
each other in an endless circle-jerk of orthodox groupthink. // 2. True investigative historians search
for original source material, and then analyze every line for clues and patterns. // 3. Teddy the Terrible -- (here)
Among the historical files is a
1915 private letter in which TR criticizes President Woodrow Wilson’s policy of "neutrality"
regarding World War I. Of course, regular readers of the ANYT should all know by now that Wilson's early "pacifism"
was fake. Evidently, ex-President Teddy did not know at the time that Wilson's handlers were waiting until after
the back-room Zionist-British verbal deal to steal Palestine was made -- and after Wilson's November 1916 re-election was
completed -- to join the European bloodbath. In the letter, TR also reveals his contempt for the millions of German-Americans
who sympathized with Germany in its purely, 100% defensive war (started in August, 1914) against the aggressive British-French-Russian
from the February 12, 1915
letter, which the Slimes' web version linked us to:
"My dear Cecil. Do not feel too badly over things. I am bitterly humiliated over what this administration
has done. I am not merely humiliated, but profoundly angered by the attitude of the professional German-Americans. But don't
forget, there are lots of Americans of German descent who do not sympathize with these men..... who are emphatically against
Germany in this fight and resent being called German-Americans.
When a President misleads us as Wilson has done, some very good
people tend to follow him."
"Cecil" is Sir Cecil Arthur Spring Rice -- a diplomat who
served as Britain's Ambassador to the United States from 1912 to 1918. We learn from Establishment
historians that "Cecil," in that capacity, was responsible for British efforts to end American neutrality and bring
America into the First World War. And, get this -- he was not just a close friend of Psycho Teddy, he had actually served as his best
man at his second wedding (TR's
first wife had died) way back in 1886 when few people had even heard of TR.
1. Ambassador to the U.S. Cecil
Rice --- He and his buddy TR were upset with Wilson (Image 2) for not warmongering against Germany. // 3. Little did they
know that Wilson's handlers were actually planning to join the war after his 1916 re-election -- a dishonest campaign
which was based on Wilson's "achievement" of keeping America out of the war!
letter constitutes clear evidence that ex-President TR -- who was still influential within American elite circles -- was already
treasonously "colluding" with foreign agents, for the purpose of dragging the U.S. into the grand war for Globalism
-- a full two years before the U.S. officially entered the war. To cover his ass, the sneaky bastard purposely left his name
off of the envelopes sent to "Cecil."
From the very opening line of that same
Your two letters have come. My letters to you will hereafter go in envelopes without my name on them,
so as to attract as little attention as possible." (full letter, here)
It doesn't get any more Deep Statish
than that! Conspire much, Mr. President?
But the real kicker for us was the date stamped on the letter
-- February 12, 1915. That's three full months before Lord
of the British Admiralty Winston Churchill set up the arms-smuggling Lusitania to be sunk by German U-boats
(or a British time-bomb?). So, even before the phony pretext that served to turn public opinion away from Germany,
TR and his crowd were already anti-German and pro-war. That's no surprise to us, of course, but oh what a powerful argument
it makes in contradiction of the fake history which holds that the U.S. government was originally neutral. No. Both the open-warmonger
Roosevelt and the closet warmonger Wilson wanted to join the war all along -- a war which, ironically, broke TR's
heart and may have led to his sudden death soon after the war's end. For it is said that he never recovered after his youngest
son's death in the very war that he had so passionately agitated for. Two other sons were badly injured.
1. The letter
to "Cecil" proves that even before the Lusitania tragedy and other "incidents," TR's crowd was already
hostile toward Germany and angling for ways to join the war in Europe. 2. Psycho dad's wished-for war got his own son, Quentin,
killed in reckless aerial combat (attacked
three planes at once) in July, 1918 (and two other sons badly wounded). TR was broken by the news
of his son's death, and died in his sleep just 8 months later, at age 61.
1. Eager to live up to the
fake legend of their "war hero" dad, Teddy Jr. and Archibald (also known for their fanaticism on the battlefield)
were also badly injured in the war that "Father" demanded they volunteer for. -- Said TR of the children of elites
who did not volunteer for the unjust war on Germany: "If they were my sons, I'd strangle them, because we have principles
in this family." // 2. Crazy Papa loved death.
1: I read in the New York Times today that the Library of Congress is digitally
publishing 1000's of documents and images from Teddy Roosevelt's collection.
Americanus 2: Teddy
Roosevelt was one of our most eloquent and intellectual presidents.
St. Sugar: Intellectual my asss! He wass a sspoiled rich brat
who dropped out of law sschool. Every position he ever held wass handed to him by the usual ssusspectss.
Editor: And he got to be president after
a communist murdered McKinley in 1901.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
SUNDAY / OCTOBER 20, 2019
Our Republic Is Under Attack From the President
If President Trump doesn’t demonstrate the leadership that America needs, then it
is time for a new person in the Oval Office.
Admiral McRaven is a former commander of the United States Special Operations Command.
A few weeks ago, we covered the story of the underhanded attack on Donald Trump by
the oh-so-estimable Globalist tool, Colon Rectum Bowell. Now comes yet another Deep State retired
military mole to launch yet another ineffective and platitude-filled assault -- this time in the form of an opinion-editorial
diatribe puked-out by Admiral William McRaven. Here's the nasty punchline:
"These men and women, of all political persuasions, have seen the assaults on our
institutions: on the intelligence and law enforcement community, the State Department and the press. They have seen our
leaders stand beside despots and strongmen, preferring their government narrative to our own. They have seen us abandon our
allies and have heard the shouts of betrayal from the battlefield. As I stood on the parade field at Fort Bragg, one retired
four-star general, grabbed my arm, shook me and shouted, “I don’t like the Democrats, but Trump is destroying
You too with the anonymous
sourcing, eh Admiral? Assuming, just for argument's sake, that this arm-grabbing, shouting "four-star general" quoted
by Raving McRaven even exists, this quote represents the worst form selective sourcing (cherry picking) imaginable
because the U.S. Military, from top-brass on down to fresh recruits, is an institution which at least 2-1 pro-Trump. Take
out the "people of color" ™ and lesbian females from the military polls, and its easily 3-1.
1. Most of the military is strongly behind Trump
// 2. The same goes for the top brass. // 3. But only Obongo-loving anti-Trumpers like Raving McRaven gets to write Op-Ed
pieces in Sulzberger's Slimes.
McRaven's ravings represent the same old-same old Globo garbage about Trump being "unfit"
for office and his "abandonment of our allies" etc. Therefore, we won't get into
rebutting the text of this ass-clown's hit-piece. Instead, let us expose McRaven by summarizing his close connection to Obongo
and the pivotal role he played in perpetrating a 2011 hoax which saved Obongo and embarrassed then-citizen Trump.
APRIL 2011: Using press conference and TV show appearences,
famous businessman and TV personality Donald Trump launches a blistering and sustained attack campaign upon President Obongo.
At issue is Obongo's 3-year-old refusal to produce a copy of his Birth Certificate to dispel rumors that he was born
in Kenya, and hence, ineligible to be president. Trump then publicly produces his own Birth Certificate; and on FOX's Bill
O'Reilly show, challenges Obongo to do likewise:
"This guy either has a birth certificate or he doesn't. I didn't think this was such a big
deal, but I will tell you, it's turning out to be a very big deal because people now are calling me from all over saying
please don't give up on this issue. People have certificates; he doesn't have a birth certificate.”
2011: In direct response to Trump's relentless and intensifying demands, Obongo calls a press confrence and
finally releases a FAKE Birth Certificate which the Piranha Press does not question. Later that same day, Obongo, oozing arrogance
and deceitfulness, appears on the Oprah Winfrey show (video here) to proclaim victory and mock Trump as a "carnival barker." Trump is subdued, but still raises questions
about its legitimacy: "We'll have to see if it is proper."
1. Internet sleuths quickly exposed
the Birth Certificate as a FAKE. /// 2. Soon after releasing the phony document, Mr. & Mr. Obongo took to the Oprah
Winfrey Show to mock Trump as a "carnival barker."
APRIL 30, 2011:
Just two days after the release of the fake certificate, in supreme arrogance, Obongo mercilessly
mocks Trump and his "conspiracy theories" at the White House Correspondent's Dinner. The audience roars in laughter
as Trump, present at the dinner with his wife, stews in humiliation. (video here)
1, 2011: Just one day after the public humiliation of Trump, the make-believe "mastermind"
of 9/11, Osama Bin Laden (already dead for many years!) is "killed" in a Navy Seal raid
carried out in Pakistan. Out of "respect for Islam," the body is quickly disposed of -- but at sea (forbidden
by Islam!) Obongo is hyped up to hero status by the Piranha Press -- "Obama killed Osama," gush his
groupies. Now, Trump really can't touch him. The "birther" controversy is dead. How convenient!
1. Trump was
publicly humiliated by the Imposter-In-Chief as the room full of journalists and official Washington laughed. // 2. The day
after, Obongo continued on his roll by announcing the killing of Bin Laden. He was by now at peak popularity and immune to
Fake News about the Obongo-McRaven
raid reported that an extensive collection of pornographic videos was found in Bin Laden's hideout.
There is a rumor afoot, started
by a retired Air Force Colonel named Field McConnel, that Obongo was recently executed ,
at Camp Gitmo by firing squad, on Trump's orders, a la John McStain -- and that his recent communications
and infrequent images are not of him. At this time, we take no position on this claim.
So, what has all this got to do with
Raving McRaven, you ask? Well, about two weeks after Trump began demanding Obongo's Birth Certificate, on April 11, 2011 to
be precise, McRaven was promoted, by Obongo, to Vice Admiral and also commander
of USSOCOM (United States Special Operations Command.)
In that high position, the ever-self-aggrandizing McRaven planned and commanded that mysterious "SEAL Team Six"
raid which may have killed someone, but it sure wasn't Bin Laden!
In June, he was promoted to full Admiral. Later that same year, on August 6th, a helicopter "crash" in
Afghanistan kills 15 Navy SEALS from the legendary "SEAL Team Six." (here) Reasonable speculation has it that some of those killed had participated in McRaven's phony raid which killed
a phony Bin Laden. Dead Seals tell no tales!
just two days later, on August 8th, Obongo's favorite Admiral McRaven -- a man who, ironically, was once kicked out of the
Navy SEALS for complaining about its culture - was honored by Obongo's Offense Secretary Leon Panetta at
the ceremony marking his new title. McRaven took care of Obongo -- and Obongo took care of him.
1. Under McRaven,
SEAL Team 6 "killed" a phony Bin Laden. Two months later, a bunch of SEALS die in a
mysterious crash. // 2. Over a span of weeks, Obongo made McRaven a Vice Admiral, and then a full Admiral.
// 3. Honored by Secretary of Offense (and former CIA boss) Panetta.
McRaven who "killed" Bin Laden later parlayed his good fortune into book sales.
read in the New York Times today that a retired Admiral has come out against Trump.
Americanus 2: Well, military men know
that he isn't qualified.
Sugar: McRaven sservess the interests of the Globalissts who made him --- not the military!!
Editor: An ambitious careerist cut from
the same crooked cloth as Pershing, Eisenhower, the McStains, McMaster and Colon Bowell.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
SUNDAY / OCTOBER 20, 2019
Our Republic Is Under Attack From the President
If President Trump doesn’t demonstrate the leadership that America needs, then it
is time for a new person in the Oval Office.
Admiral McRaven is a former commander of the United States Special Operations Command.