month, Jarek Mensfelt, spokesman for the Auschwitz memorial site, announced plans to preserve the ruins of the gas chambers
and crematoria in the notorious death camp at Birkenau near the Polish town of Oswiecim (Auschwitz). "This
is an attempt to keep it as it is now -- in ruins -- but not let the ruins
go," he said. "It was meant to be here forever as a warning."
So, Mr. Ryback, both you and Mr. Mensfelt now admit that what you claim was a gas chamber lies
in ruins. That means the "gas chambers" that are still being shown to tourists are Soviet-era "reconstructions";
a fact that "Holocaust Deniers" were once attacked for claiming. Thanks for confirming that for us in the Wall Street
Images 1 & 2 are of the Soviet-era
reconstruction of the "gas chambers". Image 3 depicts the ruins of the what is said to the original "gas chambers".
Ryback and the Polish curators concede that what is shown to gullible tourists are NOT the actual "gas chambers".
Ryback: In the coming weeks, as the Auschwitz preservationists begin their work, they should
be guided by the knowledge that these heaps of dynamited concrete and twisted steel are not only historic artifacts but
among the few remnants of untainted, forensic evidence of the Holocaust.
How exactly do these bombed out remnants constitute "forensic evidence"
of mass gas chambers? Have traces of poisonous gas been detected in the stones?
Of course, the historical and circumstantial evidence of a premeditated Nazi plan to exterminate the Jewish
population of Europe is overwhelming.
This is what
I call "the-evidence-is-overwhelming" rhetorical trick. Such a bold statement may sway the weak-minded, but it proves
nothing. Talk is cheap, as they say. My. Ryback, please share with us this "overwhelming evidence".
Ryback: There are the watch-tower-girded
enclosures of Nazi concentration camps ....
Well, duh! They were internment camps, after all. No one is denying the Jewish internment of World War II. What we want is
evidence of a genocide campaign. Continue.
Ryback: ... and the extensive testimonials of
which, as even some of your Jewish colleagues now openly admit, are often unreliable. "Speaking of "testimonials",
what do you have to say of the former Auschwitz inmates who later told of spirited soccer games and fun activities for the
children? If the German were out
to commit genocide, why were so many "survivors" allowed to live? Auschwitz alone had 9,000 survivors when the
Soviets liberated it."
Yakov Tzur testimony, March 2009: "I played soccer
games at Auschwitz in 1944"
camps had actual Jewish soccer leagues.)
Ryback: .... as well as the court protocols of Nazi war criminals,
"Nazi war criminals" were tortured and the Nuremberg Trials were a joke.
Ryback: .... but
there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent.
it! What did you just say???
Ryback: ...but there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal
That's what I thought you said.
Thank you! After just having talked about "overwhelming evidence", now you say "there is little forensic evidence".
How can that be?
Ryback: The Nazis were scrupulous when it came to obscuring the "Final Solution"
in bureaucratic euphemism and also dismantling or obliterating their machinery of death.
Yet they left the remains of the "gas chambers" on the camp grounds along with
9,000 "witnesses" behind for the Soviets to interview. That doesn't sound like too "scrupulous" of a cover
up now, does it?
Ryback: The dearth of hard evidence has fueled a growth industry in Holocaust-denial.
A "dearth (complete lack) of hard evidence". Thank you!
In other words, just because
there is no hard evidence, it is still wrong to question the Holocaust? This is known as "circular
logic". It is like a prosecutor saying to a jury: "Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, do not let the "dearth"
of hard evidence influence your verdict. The only reason why there is no hard evidence is because the defendant covered his
tracks so well."
Absurd, to say the
least. But thank you so very much for conceding that hard evidence is lacking.
Open mouth, insert foot. "The
dearth of hard evidence". Thanks,Timmy!
Ryback: The revisionists' plaint is simple: They
demand a proverbial "smoking gun" to prove that the Nazis deliberately and systematically designed an industrial
system of extermination.
us "anti-Semites" for being so impertinent as to simply ask for evidence of this "industrial system of extermination". But thanks
for admitting that there is no "smoking gun".
has been a particular target of Holocaust deniers -- in particular, the gas chamber in Auschwitz I, the original base camp
a mile east of Birkenau. It was here that some of the first experiments with poison gas were undertaken in a converted air-raid
shelter refitted with air-tight doors and special ducts for homicidal purposes. Dynamited by the Nazis in the autumn of
1944, the gas chamber was reconstructed after the war.
Why did the "Nazis" dynamite the "gas chamber". Did they suddenly decide
to stop "gassing" people? And thanks
again for conceding that the current "gas chamber" is a Soviet reconstruction, a fake.
Ryback: As one revisionist
notes: "The official view holds that the Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that had been
a 'gas chamber.' The revisionist view holds that Soviets and Poles created a 'gas chamber' in an air-raid shelter that had
been an air-raid shelter. While most serious historians refuse
to dignify such statements with a response, Polish administrators have taken the bait.
Ah yes! The "No Serious
Person" Logical Fallacy and the old "I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response" rhetorical trick. It is the
sure sign of an empty case, and an empty mind, when one has to resort to such pathetic debating tactics.
Ryback: In response to revisionist
charges, they (the Poles) tested the gas chamber walls for residual traces of cyanide
gas but found none.
no residual traces of cyanide gas. THANK YOU!
the delousing chambers whose walls
still show cyanide "staining,".....
thanks for admitting that there were "delousing chambers" at Auschwitz. In so doing, you have confirmed the fact
that the Germans were trying to prevent the inmates from dying of typhus. I suppose they had to save the Jews in order to
Ryback: ..... the gas chambers
betrayed no residual traces of Zyklon B.
So, in addition
to your concession that there is no hard evidence, you now concede that the forensic analysis shows no traces of poison gas
in the stone walls. Stone is like sponge, Timmy. Any poison gas would have been absorbed and preserved for posterity. Can
you explain, or should I say, 'rationalize' that bit of scientific reality away for us, Timmy?
Go ahead, Timmy Two-Face. Tell us why not a single trace of deadly chemicals
was found in the analysis. I gotta hear this!
We're still waiting, Timmy.
Ryback: The homicidal process was so murderously brief that the cyanide
never penetrated the interior surface.
Mass-murder gassings were too "murderously brief" to
leave a trace, but the delousing of clothes did leave a trace. That's a good one!
it was found that repeated postwar "cleaning" had leached the last traces of cyanide from the heaps of human hair,
one of the most damning pieces of Holocaust evidence.
me get this straight, Timmy. You're saying that the "Nazis" killed all those Jews in poison-gas chambers; then they
shaved the heads of the dead bodies; and finally they cremated the hairless bodies? The hair has since been repeatedly shampooed
so the poison traces are now gone? Are you flippin' serious? What were the "Nazis" planning to do with the "heaps
of human hair"? Make wigs?
Ryback: In the battle against Holocaust deniers, Birkenau's extermination facilities remain
important forensic evidence.
gonna give a friggin' heart-attack! What forensic evidence?! You just admitted that there are no traces of poison in neither
the stones nor the hair. There you go again with that quintessentially Jewish circular reasoning. "The gas chambers existed.
Although there is no hard evidence; that doesn't disprove anything because we already know that the gas chambers existed."
Ryback: Between 1942, when they were first put into operation, and 1944, when they
were dynamited, more than a million human beings -- mostly Jewish -- were fed into these extermination plants, forced into
subterranean chambers and gassed, their corpses removed and transported by mechanical conveyance to the crematoria ovens.
More than one-million were gassed, yet you said earlier that "the cyanide never penetrated the interior
surface" because the episodes were "so murderously brief". Timmy, even if the "brief" mass gassing
episodes were just 10 seconds long, when multiplied 1000's of times to reach that one million number (an average of 30,000
"gassing deaths per month", (right under the noses of Red Cross inspectors!) we're talking about many hours of poison
gassing. Why no traces of this in the forensic analysis?
And Timmy, one more thing; for nearly 50 years, you and your gang told us that 4,000,000 died at Auschwitz.
Then, after "Holocaust Deniers" began poking around Auschwitz, the official number was suddenly chopped down to
1,000,000. How do account for such a drastic reduction? And if the 4,000,000 was wrong, why should we
now take your word now on the 1,000,000?"
Cue the sound of crickets,
The chimneys belched smoke into the air.
emitting smoke? No way!
Perhaps you were expecting
little white doves to come out?
Ryback: The remnant ash was scattered in
the surrounding fields, or dumped in a nearby pond whose muddied bottom, even today, is of a sticky gray viscosity ...
So, after 60 years of natural forces at work in the pond (article written in 2004), the
"sticky gray viscosity" never went away; but the cyanide traces completely disappeared from the untouched remnants
of the stone walls and the "heaps of human hair".
Bend that "science", Timothy, bend it hard!
with matchstick-size splinters of human bone.
splinters"? Seriously, Tim? Fish and geese bone splinters and the bottom of a pond, if that. Go figure. But thanks for
conceding the fact that there are no actual bodies. No forensics, no documents, no direct witnesses, no bodies. With a "prosecutor"
like you, Timmy, who even needs a defense lawyer!
Ryback: The horrors of this machinery have been preserved in the classic
memoirs of survivor-authors like Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi...
The good ole 'Appeal to Authority' Fallacy. If it's in a book, written by other proven liars who continue
to cash in on book sales and speaking fees, it must be true, eh Timmy?
Ryback: But, as with any account filtered through human memory, this "evidence"
is subject to challenge and rebuttal. There is no arguing with presence of the Birkenau gas chambers. Here the proof of
the Holocaust is written in concrete and steel.
is no arguing"? Says who, Timmy? Says you? This is the old, "Case Closed" debating trick; a variation of the
"I-refuse-to-dignify-that-with-a-response" trick. You're right Timothy. There is "no arguing" with lunatics
and liars. But thanks for inadvertently conceding the case by repeatedly admitting that there is no evidence.
SUMMARY OF RYBACK'S CONCESSIONS
'Gas Chambers' shown to tourists are actually a "reconstruction"
used delousing chambers to prevent death by typhus
of alleged "gas chambers" tested negative for poison gas
Auschwitz death toll of "4 million" was a massive exaggeration
documentary evidence of the "Holocaust"
- No "smoking
gun" evidence / "dearth of hard evidence"
- No bodies
Keep making concessions like that and soon they'll
be calling you a "Holocaust Denier". Timmy, you have lost the
Jewdo match. Next time; know your Miranda Rights.
Full Wall Street Journal
OTHER JEWISH 'HOLOCAUST' CONCESSIONS
The "gas chambers" claim originated
in a report issued by a Soviet Committee just hours after Germany had unconditionally surrendered (and thus, could not
German documents never refer to a genocide campaign and
the story of Jews being used to make soap is a hoax. (here)
Contrary to Eisenhower's propaganda films, there was no "gas chamber" at the Dachau
Concentration Camp. (here)
Elan Steinberg, Peter Novick and others
The testimony of Holocaust survivors is often unreliable. (here) (here)
The Jewish Virtual Library
The International Red Cross inspected the German POW and concentration camps and gave passing
grades (but, of course, remained silent about the Jews). (here)
The New York Times
The '6 Million Dead' was proclaimed before a single camp had been liberated.
for the Holohoaxers to raise the White Flag of surrender!