This filthy little rat-faced "Nobel Prize winning" economist and Slimes columnist, Paul Krugman, may not
know a thing about economics - or perhaps pretends to not know - but when it comes to rhetorical trickery, kosher
Krugman is an expert without peer. In this editorial, Krugman takes the Jewish-engineered Iraqi War and hangs it around the
necks of Republican White men such as Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. Let's have a look at the contortions and omissions:
"Surprise! It turns out that there’s something to be said for having the brother of a failed president
make his own run for the White House. Thanks to Jeb Bush, we may finally have the frank discussion of the Iraq invasion
we should have had a decade ago".
Krugman, you dirty low-down Son of Satan! The reason that we never had a "frank discussion of the Iraq invasion" was because
"the paper of record", which you write for, was too busy selling the war. Do your homework Mr. Krugman! Dig
up the 2002 and 2003 issues of the Jew York Slimes and you will see that over 100 front pages pro-war stories preceded the
of course, you already know that.
Crooked Krugman continues:
"But many influential people — not just Mr. Bush — would
prefer that we not have that discussion. Yes, the narrative goes, we now know that invading Iraq was a terrible mistake,
and it’s about time that everyone admits it. Now let’s move on. Well, let’s not — because that’s
a false narrative."
Yes. It is a false narrative.
But you didn't mention the critical role played by your wretched colleague in New York, that forked-tongued Jewess, Judith
Miller. Mendacious Miller was the Slime's key point-person for pitching the "false narrative" based on her phony
Judy Miller's Lies + Slimes Front Page Hype = Iraq War.
Why don't you mention Sulzberger's and your Satanic synagogue sister's role, Paul?
Sulzberger's Satanic Slut spewed lies, death
and destruction non-stop throughout 2002 and 2003. She gets a pass from colleague Krugman.
"The Iraq war wasn’t an innocent
mistake, a venture undertaken on the basis of intelligence that turned out to be wrong. America invaded Iraq because the
Bush administration wanted a war. The public justifications for the invasion were nothing but pretexts, and falsified pretexts
Absolutely correct. But the big lie here is in the omissions.
Omission # 1:
Who was it that pumped out the "wrong intelligence"? Answer: Israel!
Omission # 2:
Who else "wanted a war"? Answer: Israel
and its American agents (Neo-Cons) and lobbyists (AIPAC)!
Omission # 3:
Who allowed the Bush / Cheney gang to get away with "falsified pretexts"?
Answer: The Jew York Slimes!
"We were, in a fundamental sense, lied into war."
Yes. We were lied into war by Bush and friends; but the operatives
of that greasy bunch were only front men and pawns of the Zionist cabal of Ariel Sharon, the Jewish Neo-Cons, and the
most powerful media institution in America, the Jew York Slimes.
Anglos Bush and Cheney are skewered for the
Iraq War; but fellow tribesmen Sharon and Satanyahu get a free pass from Krugman.
"The fraudulence of the case for war was actually obvious even at the time: the ever-shifting arguments for
an unchanging goal were a dead giveaway. So were the word games — the talk about W.M.D that conflated chemical weapons
(which many people did think Saddam had) with nukes, the constant insinuations that Iraq was somehow behind 9/11."
Correct-o-mundo, Mr. Krugman!
"The fraudulence of the case for war" as well as the "word games" were indeed extremely
"obvious"; which serves as further evidence that your Jew
York Slimes, as evidenced by its silence over the ridiculously transparent lies of Bush - Cheney - Rumsfeld - Rice- Powell,
was "in on it"!
despicable and deceitful Colon Rectum Bowell did his WMD show & tell routine at the UN, the all-mighty Jew York Slimes
hyped the performance without questioning the claims, at all! Krugman "forgets" to mention that.
"Why did they want a war? That’s a harder question to answer. Some of the warmongers believed that deploying
shock and awe in Iraq would enhance American power and influence around the world. Some saw Iraq as a sort of pilot project,
preparation for a series of regime changes. And it’s hard to avoid the suspicion that there was a strong element of
wagging the dog, of using military triumph to strengthen the Republican brand at home."
Krugman the Cunning lists every motive under the sun, except
for Israel and its Neo-Con agents. Also exempted from any blame is the Marxist Demoncrap Party, 75% of
whose members voted to grant the Republican't Bush final authorization for the invasion; an invasion which,
had the Demoncraps raised a stink about it, could easily have prevented.
"Whatever the precise motives, the
result was a very dark chapter in American history. Once again: We were lied into war. So let’s get the Iraq story right.
Yes, from a national point of view the invasion was a mistake. But (with apologies to Talleyrand) it was worse than a mistake,
it was a crime."
closing Krugman. "Whatever the precise motives", eh? As if you don't know what the true motives were! We
get it, Paulie. Though the motives are not clear, Republican White Boys are to blame for the Iraq fiasco.
Oh well, at least there were some Jewish journalists who went off
script and revealed the truth about the Iraq War. See statements below:
Speaking on MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough’s show in
July of 2013, the legendary journalist of Watergate fame said of the Iraq War: “This was an
insane war that brought us low economically, morally. We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing
to do with 9/11.
“It was a total pretext! It’s inexplicable and there
you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted
to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I’m Jewish. To bring
about a certain result ..”
On MSNBC - Joe Scarborough Show
PBS - Slate - Politico - LA Times - New Republic
"Bush's public case for going to war against Iraq is full of logical inconsistencies,
exaggerations, and outright lies. ... this raises a troubling question, what are his real reasons?
There must be some: Nobody starts a war as a lark. It would be easier to dismiss the whole
exercise if there were an obvious ulterior motive. Without one, you are left wondering, "Am
I missing something?"
The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel is
easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in
the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it. The reason is
obvious and admirable: Neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke
the classic anti-Semitic image of the king's Jewish advisers whispering poison into his
ear and betraying the country to foreign interests."
Bush Isn't Saying About Iraq
Oct. 24, 2002
war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush
to change the course of history."
In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in
the town: the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group
of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals
(a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot
Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another
and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history."
Ha'aretz News Service (Israel)
McClatchy News Services
"In 1996, as
Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to take office, eight Jewish neoconservative
leaders sent him a six-page memo outlining an aggressive vision of government. At
the top of their list was overthrowing Saddam ....... The neoconservatives
sketched out a kind of domino theory in which the governments of Syria and other Arab countries might
later fall or be replaced in the wake of Saddam's ouster."
/ FEEDBACK (fixed)